Prevention and treatment of postoperative complications of esophageal cancer / 中华胃肠外科杂志

Surgery is the primary treatment for esophageal cancer, but the postoperative complication rate remains high. Therefore, it is important to prevent and manage postoperative complications to improve prognosis. Common perioperative complications of esophageal cancer include anastomotic leakage, gastrointestinal tracheal fistula, chylothorax, and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Respiratory and circulatory system complications, such as pulmonary infection, are also quite common. These surgery-related complications are independent risk factors for cardiopulmonary complications. Complications, such as long-term anastomotic stenosis, gastroesophageal reflux, and malnutrition are also common after esophageal cancer surgery. By effectively reducing postoperative complications, the morbidity and mortality of patients can be reduced, and their quality of life can be improved.

The value and related complications of lymph node dissection along bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves in esophageal cancer patients / 中华肿瘤杂志

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors of digestive tract, lymph node metastasis is a frequently encountered metastasis in the esophageal cancer patients. The number of lymph node metastasis is reported as an important prognostic factor, and it also affects the choice of postoperative treatments in the esophageal cancer. It was reported that the recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes are the most common sites of nodal metastasis and need to be completely dissected during the esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancers. Dissection of the lymph nodes along bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves not only improves the accuracy of staging, but also improves postoperative survival of esophageal cancer patients due to reducing the local recurrence. However, it also brings problems such as injury of laryngeal recurrent nerves, and increases postoperative complications such as pulmonary complications and malnutrition due to aspiration and coughing. Therefore, it is necessary to preserve the structure and function of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves during esophagectomy through careful manipulations, and minimize the impact of complications in prognosis and quality of life from injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve.

Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy / 中华肿瘤杂志

Objective: To compare and analyze the perioperative clinical effects of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIE-Ivor-Lewis) and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE-McKeown). Methods: A total of 147 patients who underwent endoscopic esophageal cancer surgery from April 2018 to August 2019 were selected, including 85 patients undergoing MIE-McKeown surgery and 62 patients undergoing MIE-Ivor-Lewis surgery. The measurement data were expressed as (x±s), the comparison of normally distributed measurement data was performed by independent sample t-test, and the comparison of count data was performed by χ(2) test or Fisher's exact test. Results: The operation time of McKeown (M) group and Ivor-Lewis (IL) group were (219.2±72.4) minutes and (225.8±65.3) minutes. The mediastinal lymph node dissection number of M and IL groups were 13.3±4.8 and 11.6±6.5, respectively. The number of left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection were 3.5±1.2 and 3.1±1.4, respectively. The intraoperative blood loss were (178.3±41.3) ml and (163.2±64.1) ml, respectively. The number of patients reoperated for postoperative bleeding were 1 and 0, respectively. The number of patients with postoperative gastric bleeding were 0 and 1, respectively. The postoperative chest tube retention time were (2.8±1.3) days and (3.1±1.2) days, respectively. The number of patients with anastomotic leakage were 7 and 1, respectively. The number of patients with lung infection were 13 and 5, respectively, and with chylothorax were 2 and 1, respectively, without statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The number of patients with hoarseness were 11 and 3, respectively. The total incidence of complication were 41.2% (35/85) and 17.7% (11/62), and the postoperative hospital stay were (14.7±6.5) days and (12.3±2.3) days, with statistical difference (P<0.05). Conclusion: MIE-Ivor-Lewis and MIE-McKeown are safe and effective in treating esophageal cancer, but the complication of MIE-Ivor-Lewis is less than that of MIE-Mckeown, and the perioperative clinical effect of MIE-Ivor-Lewis is better than that of MIE-McKeown.

Complicaciones postoperatorias en esofagectomía por cáncer: evaluación de 215 casos según definiciones del grupo de consenso internacional / Postoperative complications in esophagectomy for cancer: evaluation of 215 cases according to definitions of the international consensus group

Resumen Introducción: La esofagectomía presenta una alta morbilidad postoperatoria. Sin embargo, las definiciones de las complicaciones son variables. Un grupo multinacional (esophagectomy complications consensus group; ECCG) propuso definiciones estandarizadas. Objetivo: Evaluar las complicaciones postoperatorias en esofagectomía según las definiciones propuestas por el ECCG. Materiales y Método: Realizamos un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, a partir de una base de datos prospectiva. Se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a una esofagectomía por cáncer entre 1996 y 2018 en un centro. Se aplicaron las definiciones de las complicaciones postoperatorias según el ECCG. Resultados: Se incluyeron 215 pacientes (Hombres 64%; edad 67 [31-82] años). Un 64% presentaban alguna comorbilidad. Existió un predominio de carcinoma escamoso con un 68%. La ubicación tumoral más frecuente fue el tercio inferior del esófago (48%). Se utilizó un abordaje abierto en 74% y mínimamente invasivo en 26%. La morbilidad postoperatoria total fue de 67%. Las complicaciones más frecuentes fueron las respiratorias alcanzando un 27%. En total, un 25% de los pacientes presentó una filtración de la anastomosis esofagogástrica, de las cuales un 24% fueron tipo II (no requirieron una reintervención quirúrgica). Se produjo una paresia de cuerda vocal en 7%, todas tipo I (no requirieron terapia específica). Se presentó una fístula quilosa en 2%, en 1% se trataron con nutrición parenteral (tipo II) y en 1% se realizó una reintervención (tipo III). Conclusión: La esofagectomía se asocia a una alta morbilidad. Las principales complicaciones son las respiratorias y las gastrointestinales. La utilización de las definiciones de consenso permite una estandarización y graduación de las complicaciones.

Introduction: Esophagectomy presents a high postoperative morbidity. However, the definitions used are variable. A multinational group (esophagectomy complications consensus group; ECCG) proposed standardized definitions. Aim: To evaluate postoperative complications in esophagectomy according to the definitions proposed by the ECCG. Materials and Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, based on a prospective database. Patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer between 1996 and 2018 at one center were included. The definitions of postoperative complications according to the ECCG were applied. Results: We included 215 patients (64% men, age 67 [31-82] years). Sixty-four percent had some comorbidity. There was a predominance of squamous carcinoma with 68%. The most frequent tumor location was the lower third of the esophagus (48%). An open approach was used in 74% and minimally invasive in 26%. Total postoperative morbidity was 67%. The most frequent complications were respiratory complications, which reached 27%. The leakage of the esophagogastric anastomosis reached 25%, 24% were type II (did not require surgical reoperation). There was a vocal cord paresis in 7%, all were classified as type I (did not require specific therapy). A chylous fistula was presented in 2%, in 1% they were treated with parenteral nutrition (type II) and in 1% a reoperation was performed (type III). Conclusion: Esophagectomy is associated with a high morbidity. The main complications are respiratory and gastrointestinal. The use of consensus definitions allows standardization and grading of complications.

Eventos adversos durante la esofagectomía mininvasiva en posición prona y su relación con la curva de aprendizaje / Adverse events during minimally invasive esophagectomy in prone position associated with the learning curve

Antecedentes: desde la introducción de la funduplicatura laparoscópica en 1991 para tratar la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico, se han desarrollado diferentes procedimientos mininvasivos hasta llegar en la actualidad a las esofagectomías totalmente toracoscópicas y laparoscópicas. Objetivo: analizar los eventos adversos durante la esofagectomía mininvasiva en posición prona durante la curva de aprendizaje. Material y métodos: en el período comprendido entre noviembre de 2011 y junio de 2017 fueron intervenidos quirúrgicamente en el Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos San Martín (HIGA) y el Instituto de Diagnóstico de La Plata 36 pacientes mediante esofagectomía mininvasiva (EMI) en posición prona (PP). Resultados: durante el tiempo abdominal se produjo una lesión de vasos coronarios. En el tiempo torácico se registraron dos lesiones pulmonares, una lesión del cayado de vena ácigos y una sección del conducto torácico; además hubo un caso de daño al nervio recurrente y una lesión del bronquio fuente izquierdo durante la linfadenectomía. Al analizar el total de las complicaciones se observó que la mayoría de ellas se presentaron en los primeros 20 casos, mientras que en los 16 siguientes solo se registró una lesión pulmonar (p=0,10). Conclusión: como conclusión podemos decir que la EMI en PP, como ya es sabido, es un procedimiento factible y seguro pero ‒dada su complejidad‒ puede provocar lesiones intraoperatorias graves. Aunque los resultados de nuestra serie no arrojaron diferencias de significancia estadística, la cantidad de eventos adversos durante las operaciones realizadas por el mismo equipo disminuyó sensiblemente en la medida en que se adquirió el entrenamiento suficiente.

Background: Since the initial description of laparoscopic fundoplication in 1991 for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, different minimally invasive procedures have been developed until nowadays, when esophagectomy is performed using combined thoracoscopy and laparoscopy. Objective: The aim of our study is to analyze the adverse events of minimally invasive esophagectomy in prone position during the learning curve. Material and methods: Between November 2011 and June 2017, 36 patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy in prone position in the Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos (HIGA) San Martín and the Instituto de Diagnóstico de La Plata. Results: During the abdominal stage one patient presented coronary vessel injury. The complications occurring in the thoracic stage included lung injury (n =2), azygos arch injury (n = 1), thoracic duct dissection (n = 1), laryngeal recurrent nerve lesion (n = 1) and main stem bronchus injury (n = 1) during lymph node resection. Most of these complications occurred in the first 20 patients, while in the remaining 16 cases only lung injury occurred (p = 0.10) Conclusion: Minimally invasive esophagectomy in prone position is a feasible and safe procedure that can cause serious intraoperative complications due to its complexity. Although the results of our series did not show statistically significant differences, the number of adverse events during surgeries performed by the same team showed an important reduction associated with better training.

Evolución y pronóstico oncológico de fístulas anastomóticas esofágicas en el tratamiento del cáncer de esófago: estudio comparativo según vía de ascenso de tubo gástrico / Outcome and oncological prognosis of esophageal anastomotic fistulas in the treatment of esophageal cancer: comparative study according to gastric tube ascent

Resumen Introducción La filtración de anastomosis esofágica es un evento que se asocia a mala evolución postoperatoria Su frecuencia y gravedad dependerá principalmente de aspectos técnicos quirúrgicos. Objetivos Analizar la frecuencia, manejo y pronóstico de las filtraciones de anastomosis esofágicas en esofagectomías por cáncer comparando la vía de ascenso del tubo gástrico y sitio de anastomosis. Material y Método Análisis de base prospectiva de pacientes con cáncer esofágico sometidos a esofagectomía. Análisis estadístico con test exacto de Fisher. Resultados De un total de 37 pacientes con cáncer esofágico tratados en nuestra institución en el período de estudio (5 años), se incluyeron 34 esofagectomías totalmente mini invasivas secundarias a cáncer de esófago. Un 79,4% correspondieron a esofagectomías totales con anastomosis cervical, en el 20,6% restante se realizó esofagectomía distal con anastomosis intratorácica. La tasa de filtración de la anastomosis esofágica fue de un 38,2% (13/34), todas fueron secundarias a esofagectomías totales. De estas un 69,2% (9/13) se clasificaron como Clavien - Dindo I-II. La tasa de filtración fue de 54,5% (6/11) para ascenso retroesternal y 43,7% (7/16) para ascenso mediastínico, sin ser estadísticamente diferente (p = 1,0). La tasa de reoperaciones fue de un 11,7%, siendo en todas secundario a ascensos mediastínicos posteriores, de estas fueron 3 casos de aseos vídeo-toracoscópicos y una reparación de vena innominada. No existió diferencia estadística entre las vías de ascenso y la tasa de reoperaciones (p = 0,26). La serie presentó una mortalidad quirúrgica de 5,8% concentrados todos en el grupo de pacientes con esofagectomías totales con ascenso mediastínico posterior. Conclusión Las filtraciones en anastomosis esofágicas son frecuentes en pacientes operados con intención curativa de cáncer esofágico. Las filtraciones de anastomosis esofágicas cervicales con ascenso retroesternal no requirieron reoperaciones, ni presentaron mortalidad postoperatoria.

Introduction Post operative leaks of esophageal anastomosis after esophagectomy is a risky event associated with poor postoperative evolution. Its frequency and severity will depend mainly on surgical technical aspects. Objectives To analyze the frequency, management and prognosis of leakage of esophageal anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Material and Method Analysis of our prospective oncologic database of patients with esophageal cancers submmitted to esofagectomy. Statistical analysis with Fisher's exact test. Results 34 out of 37 esophageal cancer patients were included submitted to completely invasive mini esophagectomy. Cervical anastomosis was performed in 79.4% of patients, in the remaining 20.6%, a distal esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis was performed. The leak rate was 38.2% (13/34), of these, 69.2% (9/13) correspond to grade Clavien - Dindo I - II complications. The leak rate was 54.5% (6/11) for retro-sternal gastric ascensus and 43.7% (7/16) for mediastinal route, without significative difference (p = 1.0). The reoperation rate was 11.7%, being a 100% secondary to mediastinal ascensus, 3 of them were submitted to thoracoscopic toilets and an innominate vein repair. Postoperative mortality rate was 5.8%, all concentrated in the group of patients with posterior mediastinal ascensus, but without statistical difference (p = 0.26). Conclusion Leaks are frequent in patients operated on for esophageal cancer, especially after cervical esophago-gastro-anastomosis with anterior route for ascensus. However, retro-sternal ascensus did not require re-operations, nor postoperative mortality compared to gastric ascensus through posterior mediastinum

Analysis of risk factors for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome after esophagectomy / 北京大学学报(医学版)

OBJECTIVE@#To explore the incidence and risk factors for the acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after resection of esophageal carcinoma.@*METHODS@#We retrospectively analyzed 422 consecutive patients admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine with esophageal carcinoma undergoing esophagectomy from January 2010 to December 2016 in Peking University Cancer Hospital. ALI/ARDS were diagnosed, the patients were divided into ALI/ARDS group and control group without ALI/ARDS, the differences of clinical features were contrasted between the two groups, and the multivariate Logistic regression modeling was used to identify the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS.@*RESULTS@#In the study, 41 ALI/ARDS cases were diagnosed, making up 9.7% (41/422) of all the enrolled patients undergoing esophagectomy. Comparisons of the ALI/ARDS group and the control group indicated significant statistical differences in the average length of their hospital stay [(18.9±9.7) d vs. (14.8±3.6) d, P=0.011], the proportion of the patients who needed mechanical ventilation support [51.2% (21/41) vs. 9.4% (36/381), P<0.001] and in-hospital mortality [31.7% (13/41) vs. 5.0% (19/381), P<0.001]. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the patients with ALI/ARDS and without ALI/ARDS in smoking history (P=0.064), preoperative forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) (P=0.020), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (P=0.011), body weight index (BMI) (P=0.044), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification (P=0.049) and one lung ventilation duration (P=0.008), while multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative FEV1/FVC (OR=1.053, P=0.016, 95%CI 1.010-1.098), ASA physical status classification (OR=2.392, P=0.033, 95%CI 1.073-5.335) and one lung ventilation duration (OR=0.994, P=0.028, 95%CI 0.989-0.999) were the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy.@*CONCLUSION@#ALI/ARDS was a serious complication in patients undergoing esophagectomy associated with increment in length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative FEV1/FVC, ASA classification and one lung ventilation duration were the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy. Carefully assessing the patient before operation, shortening one lung ventilation duration were the key points in preventing ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy.

Esophagectomy with gastroplasty in advanced megaesophagus: late results of omeprazole use / Esofagectomia com gastroplastia no megaesôfago avançado: análise tardia da importância do uso do omeprazol

Objective: To analyze the late results of advanced Chagasic megaesophagus treatment by esophagectomy associated with the use of proton pump inhibitor (omeprazole) as for the incidence of esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus in the remaining stump. Methods : We studied patients with advanced megaesophagus undergoing esophagectomy and transmediastinal esophagogastroplasty. Patients were divided into three groups: A (20) with esophageal replacement by full stomach, without the use of omeprazole; B (20) with esophageal replacement by full stomach, with omeprazole 40 mg/day introduced after the first postoperative endoscopy and maintained for six years; and C (30) with esophageal replacement by gastric tube with use of omeprazole. Dysphagia, weight loss and BMI were clinical parameters we analyzed. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed in all patients, and determined the height of the anastomosis, the aspect of the mucosa, with special attention to possible injuries arising from gastroesophageal reflux, and the patency of the esophagogastric anastomosis. Results : We studied 50 patients, 28 males (56%) and 22 (44%) females. All underwent endoscopy every year. In the first endoscopy, erosive esophagitis was present in nine patients (18%) and Barrett's esophagus, in four (8%); in the last endoscopy, erosive esophagitis was present in five patients (8%) and Barrett's esophagus in one (2%). When comparing groups B and C, there was no evidence that the manufacturing of a gastric tube reduced esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus. However, when comparing groups A and C, omeprazole use was correlated with reduction of reflux complications such as esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus (p <0.005). Conclusion : The use of omeprazole (40 mg/day) reduced the onset of erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus during the late postoperative period.

Objetivo : analisar os resultados tardios do tratamento do megaesôfago chagásico avançado através da esofagectomia associada ao IBP (omeprazol), com vistas à incidência de esofagite e esôfago de Barrett do coto esofagiano remanescente. Métodos : foram estudados pacientes com megaesôfago avançado submetidos à esofagectomia e à esofagogastroplastia transmediastinal posterior. Os pacientes foram distribuídos em três grupos: A (20) com substituição esofagiana por meio do estômago total, sem o uso do omeprazol; B (20) com substituição esofagiana por meio do estômago total, sem o uso do omeprazol durante este período; após a primeira endoscopia, realizada no pós-operatório, foi introduzido IBP (omeprazol 40mg/dia) e mantido por seis anos; e C (30) com substituição esofagiana por meio do tubo gástrico com uso do omeprazol. A disfagia, a perda ponderal e o IMC foram os parâmetros clínicos analisados. A endoscopia digestiva alta foi realizada em todos os pacientes. Foi determinada a altura da anastomose, a aparência do aspecto da mucosa, com especial atenção para possíveis lesões oriundas de refluxo gastresofágico, a patência da anastomose esofagogástrica. Resultados : na primeira endoscopia, a esofagite erosiva esteve presente em nove pacientes (18%) e o esôfago Barrett, em quatro (8%); na última endoscopia, a esofagite erosiva esteve presente em quatro pacientes (8%) e o esôfago de Barrett em um (2%). Comparando-se os grupos B e C, não houve redução da esofagite e do esôfago de Barrett. Porém, comparando-se os grupos A e C, houve redução de complicações do refluxo, como esofagite e o esôfago de Barrett (p<0,005). Conclusão : os resultados obtidos permitem concluir que o uso de omeprazol (40mg/dia) reduziu o aparecimento de esofagite erosiva e esôfago de Barrett no decorrer do pós-operatório tardio.

Avaliação das complicações da esofagectomia de resgate na terapêutica cirúrgica do câncer de esôfago avançado / Complications of the rescue esophagectomy in advanced esophageal cancer

RACIONAL: Apesar das inúmeras opções terapêuticas, o prognóstico da neoplasia maligna de esôfago continua sombrio. Devido à baixa taxa de cura da esofagectomia, foram desenvolvidas novas propostas de tratamento como a quimioterapia e radioterapia isoladas ou associadas, concomitante ou não à cirurgia, além da quimiorradiação exclusiva. A esofagectomia de regaste surge como opção terapêutica para aqueles pacientes com recorrência ou persistência da doença após tratamento clínico. OBJETIVO: Avaliar os resultados da esofagectomia de resgate em pacientes com câncer de esôfago submetidos previamente à quimiorradiação exclusiva, assim como descrever as complicações locais e sistêmicas. MÉTODO: Foram analisados retrospectivamente 18 pacientes com diagnóstico inicial de carcinoma epidermóide de esôfago irressecável, submetidos previamente à quimiorradioterapia. Após o tratamento oncológico eles foram examinados quanto às suas condições clínicas pré-operatórias. Foi realizada a esofagectomia por toracotomia direita e reconstrução do trânsito digestivo por cervicolaparotomia. Os mesmos foram avaliados no período pós-operatório tanto em relação às complicações locais e sistêmicas como em relação à qualidade de vida. RESULTADOS: As complicações foram frequentes, sendo que cinco pacientes desenvolveram fístula por deiscência da anastomose. Quatro desses evoluíram de maneira satisfatória. Cinco também apresentaram estenose esofagogástrica cervical, mas responderam bem à dilatação endoscópica. Infecção pulmonar foi outra complicação observada e presente em sete pacientes, sendo inclusive causa de óbito em dois deles. Dentre os em que se conseguiu realizar seguimento com tempo médio de 5,6 anos, 53,8% estão vivos sem doença. CONCLUSÕES: Existe elevada morbidade da esofagectomia de regaste principalmente após longo espaço de tempo entre quimiorradiação e a cirurgia, propiciando maior dano tecidual e predisposição à formação de fistulas anastomóticas. No entanto, os resultados se mostram favoráveis àqueles que não possuem mais opções terapêuticas.

BACKGROUND: Even though the esophageal cancer has innumerous treatment options its prognosis is still unsettled. Because esophagectomy is rarely curative, new and emerging therapies come to light such as isolated chemotherapy and radiotherapy or combined chemoradiation, followed or not by surgery. The rescue esophagectomy is an alternative for those patients with recurrent or advanced disease. AIM: To evaluate the results of the rescue esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer who had previously undergone chemoradiation and describe local and systemic complications of the procedure. METHODS: Eighteen patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were treated with chemoradiation followed by rescue esophagectomy. All of them presented the preoperative clinical conditions required to indicate the surgical procedure. Transthoracic esophagectomy with right side thoracotomy plus midline laparotomy was performed. Patients were evaluated with regard to any postoperative complications. RESULTS: There were five patients with evidence of fistula at the level of the anastomosis, and four of them progressed satisfactorily. Postoperative dilation was needed in five out of eighteen patients due to stenosis of the esophagogastric suture line. Seven patients did develop pulmonary infection with a fatal outcome for two of them. Among the patients who were available for a five-year follow-up, there was a rate of 53.8% of disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: These patients presented an elevated morbidity of the procedure related to many factors such as the long period between chemoradiation and surgery, which leads to tissue injury resulting in anastomotic fistulas. Nevertheless, esophagectomy seems to be valuable in cases without any other therapeutic option.

The Role of One-Year Endoscopic Follow-Up for the Esophageal Remnant and Gastric Conduit after Esophagectomy with Gastric Reconstruction for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE: After esophagectomy and gastric reconstruction for esophageal cancer, patients suffer from various symptoms that can detract from quality of life. Endoscopy is a useful diagnostic tool for evaluating patients after esophagectomy. This observational study was performed to investigate the correlation between symptoms and endoscopic findings one year after esophageal surgery and to assess the clinical usefulness of one-year endoscopic follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2008, 162 patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction were endoscopically examined one year after operation. RESULTS: Patients suffered from the following symptoms: nocturnal cough (n=10), regurgitation (n=7), cervical heartburn (n=3), lump sensation (n=2), dysphagia (n=20) and odynophagia (n=22). Eighty-five (52.5%) patients had abnormal findings on endoscopic examination. Twelve (7.4%) patients had reflux esophagitis, and 37 (22.8%) patients had an anastomotic stricture. Only stricture-related symptoms were correlated with the finding of anastomotic strictures (p<0.001). Two patients had recurrences at the anastomotic sites, and four patients had regional lymph node recurrences with gastric conduit invasion visualized by endoscopy. Newly-developed malignancies in the esophageal remnant or hypopharynx that were not detected by clinical symptoms and imaging studies were reported in two patients. CONCLUSION: One year after esophagectomy, endoscopic findings were not correlated with clinical symptoms, except those related to stricture. Routine endoscopic follow-up is a useful tool for identifying latent functional and oncological lesions.

Postoperative chest physical therapy prevents respiratory complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy / Fisioterapia respiratória pós-operatória previne complicações respiratórias em pacientes submetidos à esofagectomia

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy presents the highest rate of postoperative pulmonary complications among all types of upper abdominal surgery. The benefits of chest physical therapy in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery have been shown by many studies; however, its specific effect in patients receiving esophagectomy has been seldom investigated. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the frequency of respiratory complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy receiving chest physical therapy compared to no treatment. METHODS: 70 consecutive patients were evaluated retrospectively and allocated to two groups: control group (CG=no physical therapy; n=30) and chest physical therapy group (PTG; n=40). Patients received chest physical therapy which includes lung re-expansion and airway clearance maneuvers. They were not submitted to either noninvasive ventilation or exercises with devices that generate airways positive pressure. All patients were instructed to early mobilization. Information about pre-operative and respiratory complications were collected. Statistic analysis to compare the frequency of respiratory complications was performed by the Z test. The significance level was set to 5 percent. RESULTS: Patients in the CG and PTG were similar in terms of age, BMI, smoking and drinking status, malignant diseases, surgical and anesthesia duration and types of esophagectomy (p>0.05). Our results show that patients received chest physical therapy after esophagectomy had a lower frequency of respiratory complications (15 percent vs. 37 percent, p<0.05). In addition, the PTG needed a shorter duration of antibiotic treatment and thoracic drainage as well as less re-intubation compared with the control group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that chest physical therapy treatment reduces respiratory complications and the need for care but does not influence on hospital length of stay.

CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO: A esofagectomia apresenta a maior taxa de complicações pulmonares pós-operatórias dentre as cirurgias abdominais altas. Os benefícios da fisioterapia respiratória em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia abdominal alta convencional têm sido mostrados na literatura, porém esse efeito na esofagectomia tem sido pouco investigado. OBJETIVOS: Comparar a frequência de complicações respiratórias em dois grupos de pacientes submetidos à esofagectomia, tendo um recebido fisioterapia respiratória e o outro não. MÉTODOS: Setenta pacientes consecutivos (nenhuma exclusão) foram avaliados retrospectivamente e divididos em dois grupos: controle (GC=sem fisioterapia; n=30) e fisioterapia respiratória (GFT; n=40). O PTG recebeu manobras para expansão pulmonar e higiene das vias aéreas. Nenhum deles foi submetido à ventilação não-invasiva ou a exercícios com pressão positiva. Todos os pacientes foram orientados à mobilização ativa, progressiva e precoce. Foram coletadas informações sobre o perioperatório e complicações respiratórias. A frequência de complicações respiratórias entre os grupos foi analisada pelo teste z, considerando p<0,05. RESULTADOS: Pacientes de ambos os grupos foram similares quanto à idade, IMC, tabagismo e etilismo, doença maligna, tempos cirúrgico e anestésico e tipos de esofagectomia (p>0,05). Nossos resultados mostram que pacientes que receberam fisioterapia respiratória após a esofagectomia tiveram uma frequência menor de complicações respiratórias (15 por cento vs. 37 por cento, p<0,05). O PTG precisou de menos tempo de antibioticoterapia e de drenagem torácica, assim como teve menos reintubação, comparado com o controle (p<0,05). CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados sugerem que a fisioterapia respiratória após esofagectomia reduz as complicações respiratórias e a necessidade de cuidados clínicos, mas não reduz o tempo de hospitalização.

Esofagectomia trans-hiatal versus transtorácica: experiência do Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA) / Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy: experience of the Brazilian National Cancer Institute

OBJETIVO: Analisar comparativamente a morbimortalidade e sobrevida após esofagectomia trans-hiatal (TH) ou transtorácica (TT). METODOS: Estudo retrospectivo não randomizado de 68 pacientes com neoplasia de esôfago operados no INCA entre 1997 e 2005, divididos em dois grupos: 1 - TH (33 pacientes); e 2 - TT (35 pacientes). RESULTADOS: A idade média foi 40,7 anos (25 - 74 anos), sendo 73,5 por cento homens. Tumores do 1/3 médio predominaram no Grupo 2 (48,6 por cento versus 21,2 por cento, p = 0,02). A média de linfonodos dissecados foi maior no Grupo 2 (21,6 versus 17,8 linfonodos, p = 0,04), porém sem diferença no número de linfonodos metastáticos (4,1 versus 3,9 linfonodos, p = 0,85). O tempo cirúrgico médio foi maior no Grupo 2 (410 versus 270 minutos, p = 0,001). O tempo médio de internação também foi maior no Grupo 2 (19 versus 14 dias, p = 0,001). A morbidade operatória foi 50 por cento, sem diferença significativa (42,4 por cento versus 57,1 por cento, p = 0,23). Fístula esofágica ocorreu em 13,2 por cento, sem diferença significativa (9,1 por cento versus 17,1 por cento, p = 0,23). A mortalidade foi 5,8 por cento (04 pacientes), sem diferença significativa (1,4 por cento versus 4,4 por cento, p = 0,83). CONCLUSÃO: Neste estudo, a morbimortalidade não apresentou diferença em relação à via de acesso para a esofagectomia, apesar do maior tempo cirúrgico e de permanência hospitalar na via TT. A sobrevida global em 3 e 5 anos também foi maior na TT, possivelmente devido a maior freqüência de estágios iniciais em pacientes submetidos à transtorácica.

OBJECTIVE: Analyses of morbidity, mortality and overall survival after transhiatal (TH) or transthoracic (TT) esophagectomy. METHODS: Retrospective non randomized study of 68 patients with esophagus neoplasia operated in the Brazilian National Cancer Institute between 1997 and 2005. We divided in two groups: Group 1 - TH (33 patients); and Group 2 - TT (35 patients). RESULTS: The mean age was 40,7 years old (25 - 74 years old), being 73,5 percent male. Middle third tumors predominated in Group 2 (48,6 percent vs. 21,2 percent, p = 0,02). The mean of dissected lymph nodes was biggest in Group 2 (21,6 vs. 17,8 lymph nodes, p = 0,04), however without difference in number of metastatic lymph nodes (4,1 vs. 3,9 linfonodos, p = 0,85). The mean of operative time was higher in Group 2 (410 vs. 270 minutes, p = 0,001). Also the mean of length of stay was higher in Group 2 (19 vs. 14 days, p = 0,001). The operative morbidity was 50 percent, without statistical difference between the groups (42,4 percent vs. 57,1 percent, p = 0,23). Esophageal leakage occurred in 13,2 percent of cases, also without statistical difference (9,1 percent vs. 17,1 percent, p = 0,23). The mortality was 5,8 percent (04 patients), without statistical difference (1,4 percent vs. 4,4 percent, p = 0,83). CONCLUSION: In our study, the morbidity and mortality showed no statistical difference in relation to the access performed, although higher operative time and length of stay were observed in TT access. The 3 and 5-years overall survival also were biggest in TT access, probably due to the biggest frequency of patients on initial stages between the submitted to the TT access.

Cáncer de la unión gastroesofágica: Evaluación de los resultados quirúrgicos, sobrevida alejada y factores pronósticos en enfermos con terapia resectiva / Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: Retrospective analysis of 39 patients

Background: The long-term survival of adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction is poor and depends on the possibility of performing a complete surgical excision and the absence of lymph node involvement. Aim: To report surgical results and survival of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction. Material and Methods: Retrospective review of medical records of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction, subjected to a curative surgical procedure between 2000 and 2008. Deaths that occurred within 60 days of the operation were considered operative mortality. Tumor stage was determined using TNM and Siewert pathological classifications. Results: Thirty-nine patients aged 40 to 80years (27 men), were operated. According to Siewert classification, seven patients had type I, six type II and 26 type III tumors. Twenty-two patients were subjected to a total gastrectomy with partial excision of distal esophagus and mediastinal reconstruction, 10patients were subjected to a trans-hiatal esophagectomy and seven to a total esophagogastrectomy. According to postoperative staging, five patients were in stage I, 12 in stage II, nine in stage III and 13 in stage IV. Median, three and five year's survival figures were 21.4 months, 33 and 25 percent, respectively. Lymph node and perineural involvement was associated with a lower survival. Well differentiated and stage I tumors had a better survival. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of a type III tumor, N3 lymph node involvement and vascular permeation were independent predictors' ofa lower survival. Conclusions: Among patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction, type III tumors, lymph node involvement and vascular permeations are associated with a lower survival.

Trans-thoracic versus trans-hiatal esophagectomy complications and outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer in Shohada-E-Tajrish Hospital, Tehran, Iran; 2000-2008

Esophageal cancer is a poor-prognosis cancer which is common in Iran. The main treatment for this cancer is surgery which may be performed with either trans-thoracic [TTE] or trans-hiatal esophagectomy [THE]. Each of these methods has some specific complications, morbidity and mortality rate, leading to controversies in method selection. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the outcomes of these two approaches in Iranian patients. In this retrospective survey, we evaluated 100 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent either TTE or THE in Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital, Tehran, from 2000 to 2008 and categorized them into two groups. The patients in the two groups were compared according to age, sex, tumor location and histopathologic characteristics, surgery results and complications, morbidity, mortality and death results. Sixty nine percent [69%] of patients had squamous cell carcinoma [SCC] and 59% had undergone THE. The mean age of the patients was 61.18 years. There was no difference in age, sex distribution, tumor pathology and location in the two groups. Although neck leakage of anastomoses was more frequent in THE [7.31% vs 10.16%], there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in complications and mortality. Duration of the surgery was longer in TTE. Trans-hiatal and trans-thoracic esophagectomy are the same in outcomes. Both methods can be considered as therapeutic surgical approach regarding to physician's opinion and patient's situations

Tratamento cirúrgico do megaesôfago no Hospital de Clínicas da UNICAMP - fatores associados a melhores ou a piores resultados / Surgical treatment of megaesophagus at UNICAMP Hospital of Clinics - associated factors with better and worse results

OBJETIVO: Estudar e verificar os possíveis fatores associados a melhores ou a piores resultados cirúrgicos em pacientes submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico para megaesôfago. MÉTODOS: Um estudo retrospectivo analisou dados específicos nos prontuários dos pacientes. Avaliaram-se a ocorrência de complicações no intra ou no pós-operatório e a manutenção de queixas de disfagia que merecesse alguma intervenção após a cirurgia, com o auxílio de um questionário dirigido, estudando possíveis associações a: modalidade cirúrgica adotada, grau da doença, etiologia e presença de outras doenças digestivas. O total de pacientes operados foi 417, sendo levantados 390 prontuários. RESULTADOS: Foram 360 cardiomiotomias, 20 esofagectomias e 11 mucosectomias. Sete pacientes saíram da análise por não estarem adequadamente registrados. CONCLUSÃO: O tipo de operação é o que mais influi nos resultados cirúrgicos (as cardiomiotomias têm melhor resolução); as complicações são maiores com o aumento do grau do megaesôfago. O tratamento cirúrgico em pacientes com doença chagásica teve resultados piores que nos pacientes com megaesôfago idiopático; a associação de outras doenças do trato digestivo é fator de piora nos resultados pós-cirúrgicos.

OBJECTIVES: To verify some possible factors, which would be associated with better or worse results for surgical treatment of megaesophagus. MEHTODS: There were 417 patients operated on for megaesophagus, but only 390 medical charts were analyzed between 1989 and 2005. The presence of intraoperative and postoperative complications and the maintenance of severe dysphagia complaints were evaluated in a directed questionnaire, studying association with: the surgical approach chosen, megaesophagus degree, etiology and presence of other digestive alterations. RESULTS: There were 360 cardiomiotomies, 20 esophagectomies and 11 mucosectomies. The results indicate that the cardiomiotomy is the safest surgery and the esophagectomy has more complications. The degree of megaesophagus is directed related with the results; more advanced megaesophagus has the worse results. The presence of digestive alterations has also a direct influence with worse results. CONLCUSION: The most important factor considering the results is the surgery chosen, and the best one were seen with cardiomiotomy. The degree of megaesophagus has also influenced the results. The etiology suggests better results with Chagas disease patients, maybe for the chronic course of this disease. The presence of digestive alteration is a factor which causes worse results, especially if associated with gastritis, esophagitis, megacolon and others.

Predicting factors for anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer resection

Esophageal anastomosis leaks continue to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy. The purpose of the present study was to identify the predisposing factors of esophageal anastomotic leakage. 95 patients who underwent surgical resection for esophageal or cardia cancer were included for the study. The mean age of the patients was 59.5 years and male to female ratio was 1.56 to 1. The preferred management strategy for anastomotic leakage was the conservative approach when possible. The operative approach was reserved for those patients with fulminant sepsis or those who did not respond to the conservative management. Data were analyzed using SPSS 13.0 software and P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Sixty six patients had cervical esophageal anastomosis and 29 had intrathoracic anastomosis; 18.9% anastomotic leakage was diagnosed. Patients with symptoms longer than 6 months prior to operation, and diabetic patients had a significantly higher risk of anastomotic leakage. Our data showed that the presences of diabetes mellitus as well as prolonged symptoms [more than six months] are associated with higher anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Controlling blood glucose, early diagnosis of esophageal cancer, early resection of tumor before a long-term period of symptoms, and effective screening program for esophageal cancer may reduce the risk of esophageal leakage

Efeito da continuidade da fisioterapia respiratória até a alta hospitalar na incidência de complicações pulmonares após esofagectomia por câncer / Effect of sustained respiratory care until hospital discharge on the incidence of pulmonary complications following esophagectomy by cancer

O presente estudo avaliou os efeitos na incidência de complicações pulmonares do cuidado contínuo de fisioterapia respiratória no pós-operatório de esofagectomia, até a alta hospitalar. examinaram-se retrospectivamente 40 prontuários de pacientes de esofagectomia consecutivos (nenhuma exclusão), que foram...

This study assessed the effects of chest physical therapy all through hospital stay until discharge onto the incidence of pulmonary complications in patients having undergone esophagectomy by cancer. Medical of records of esophagectomy patients were examined...